A business owner’s finance roadmap is the order in which lending decisions are made: the exit, the costs and the funding first, then the valuation, the equity split and the ownership entity, and only then the purchase. In episode 109 of Finance This, Property That, Dion Fernandes explains why that sequence can matter more than the next tax return.
Self-employed borrowers are often told the same thing: wait two years, improve the financials, then come back. For business owners with strong equity, assets and a clear investment strategy, that advice can miss the more useful question. Not how much more income is needed, but in what order the decisions should be made.
Why are business owners told to wait two years?
Because a lender assesses self-employed income from lodged financials, and the simplest answer to a weak year on paper is to wait for a stronger one.
The first client in this episode owned a development site and wanted to move forward with a build. They had spoken with three other lending advisers and a bank. The advice was consistent every time: wait two years.
Waiting has its own cost. While this client waited, construction costs kept rising, and their taxable income actually looked worse at the exact time they needed it to look stronger. Taxable income does not always tell the full story of a business owner’s position.
How can equity fund a development instead of income?
Rather than focusing only on the tax returns, Dion looked at the whole position: the equity available in the land, the development costs, the expected exit and the overall funding stack.
By mapping out the exit first, then the costs and then the funding structure, the client was able to move forward without waiting for another two years of financials. Whether an approach like this suits any individual project depends on the site, the numbers and the lender’s assessment.
What development costs are most often underestimated?
The build contract is only part of the cost. The items that tend to be underestimated are the ones that arrive before and around it:
- Planning. Approvals and the consultants needed to get there.
- Surveys and engineering. The reports a site needs before anything is built.
- Civil works. Site preparation, drainage and access.
- Headworks. Connection charges for water, sewer and other services.
If these are missing from the numbers, the funding stack is built on the wrong total. Mapping them early is part of knowing whether the project stacks up at all.
What is the difference between offset and redraw?
Looking only at the loan balance, the two can appear the same. The consequences can be very different when the money is later used for investment.
Funds sitting in an offset account are your savings, held against the loan. Money drawn back out of a loan through redraw is new borrowing. If that redrawn money is then used for a different purpose, such as an investment, it can change the purpose of that part of the debt.
Why can redraw create complications for investment lending?
Because loan purpose is what makes a debt easy or difficult to trace. When private and investment purposes become mixed inside one loan, tracing which portion was used for what becomes harder, and that can complicate the deductibility of interest. Keeping funds in an offset account can often provide a cleaner separation, depending on the individual situation and the loan structure.
How any of this applies to your own loans is a question for your accountant. The broader point is that the structure should be considered before the money moves, not reconstructed afterwards.
Why should buying the property be step four?
Because by the time the property search begins, the structure should already be in place. Dion sets out four steps for investors growing a portfolio:
- Step one: value. Obtain a proper valuation on the existing property.
- Step two: split. Separate the available equity into its own loan facility.
- Step three: entity. Decide the ownership structure, whether personal names, a trust, a company or an SMSF.
- Step four: buy. Only then start looking for the property.
Why choose the ownership entity before signing a contract?
Because the entity named on the contract shapes the lending that follows. Choosing the entity after signing can significantly limit lending options and may be extremely difficult to reverse.
Trusts, companies and SMSFs each carry different lending policies and different considerations. Which structure suits a particular investor is a decision to make with an accountant and legal adviser, and it belongs before the property search, not after the contract.
What is the full roadmap?
Dion reduces the episode to one line: exit, costs, funding, value, split, entity, then buy.
For business owners who have been told to simply wait two years, the answer may not always be more income. Sometimes it is having the right strategy, structure and sequence in place.
- 00:00Why “wait two years” is not always the answer. The advice self-employed borrowers hear most.
- 00:35Funding the build, not only the tax returns. Looking at the whole position.
- 01:10Using equity to structure the development. The land as the starting point.
- 01:45The hidden costs people forget. Planning, surveys, engineering, civil works and headworks.
- 02:15Exit, costs and the funding stack. Mapping the project in the right order.
- 02:40Offset versus redraw. Similar balances, different consequences.
- 03:15Why redraw can create problems later. When loan purpose changes.
- 03:50Keeping loan purpose clean. Why easy tracing matters.
- 04:15Why the property is step four. Structure before the search.
- 04:35Step one: value the existing property. A proper valuation first.
- 04:50Step two: separate the available equity. Its own loan facility.
- 05:05Step three: choose the ownership entity. Personal names, trust, company or SMSF.
- 05:30Step four: then start looking. Only now does the search begin.
- 05:45Exit, costs, funding, value, split, entity, then buy. The roadmap in one line.
Prefer to start with the framework? Download the free Portfolio Blueprint →
Key questions this episode answers
What is episode 109 of Finance This, Property That about?
Episode 109 is a solo episode in which Dion Fernandes explains why business owners told to wait two years for better tax returns may be better served by getting the order of decisions right. It covers a self-employed client funding a development from land equity, the difference between offset and redraw and a four-step sequence before the next purchase. General information only, not credit, tax or financial advice.
Do self-employed borrowers always have to wait two years for a loan?
Not always. Lenders assess self-employed income from lodged financials, which is why waiting is common advice. In the episode, a self-employed client with a development site moved forward by mapping the exit, the costs and the funding stack against the equity in the land rather than relying only on taxable income. Whether that suits any individual position depends on the numbers and is subject to assessment and lender criteria.
What development costs are often underestimated?
Beyond the build contract, the costs most often underestimated are planning, surveys, engineering, civil works and headworks. Leaving them out means the funding stack is built on the wrong total, so they should be mapped early, alongside the exit, before the funding structure is set.
What is the difference between offset and redraw?
Money in an offset account is your own savings held against the loan, while money taken through redraw is new borrowing. If redrawn funds are used for a different purpose, such as an investment, it can change the purpose of that part of the debt and complicate loan tracing and the deductibility of interest. How this applies to your own loans is a question for your accountant.
What should happen before buying the next investment property?
Dion describes buying the property as step four, not step one. First, obtain a proper valuation on the existing property. Second, separate the available equity into its own loan facility. Third, decide the ownership structure, whether personal names, a trust, a company or an SMSF, with your accountant and legal adviser. Only then start the property search, because choosing the entity after signing a contract can limit lending options and be difficult to reverse.
The takeaway
Waiting for better financials is one answer. It is not always the only one.
Mapping the exit, the costs and the funding before a build, keeping offset and redraw separate before money moves and settling the valuation, split and entity before the property search are what put the structure ahead of the decision rather than behind it.
Exit, costs, funding, value, split, entity, then buy.
This episode is a general discussion of self-employed lending, development funding, offset and redraw and the order of decisions before a purchase. The information is general in nature, does not take your individual circumstances into account and is not credit, tax, accounting, legal or financial product advice. No rate, term or approval is offered or implied. The client example is a real engagement; individual circumstances differ and outcomes depend on assessment and lender criteria. The tax treatment of redraw, loan purpose and interest deductibility is a matter for your accountant, and the choice of ownership structure, including trusts, companies and SMSFs, is a matter for your accountant and legal adviser. Speak with your own advisers about your position before acting.